Answer:
current societal norms rendered the charitable immunity doctrine inapplicable to this case and that fundamental fairness allowed the court to deviate from established case precedent and find for Flagiello.
Explanation:
In Appeals, Nos. 293 and 351, Jan. T., 1964, from judgments of Court of Common Pleas No. 4 of Philadelphia County, Dec. T., 1963, No. 4018 is found a case of Mrs. C Mary, and her husband Thomas Flagiello against the Pennsylvania Hospital, in which the Flagiellos rightly stated that Mrs Mary was injured in the Pennsylvania Hospital where she paid $24.50 a day for hospital facilities and nursing care. An action of trespass was brought against the medical institution and two employees were said to be involved.
The hospital accepted their wrong doings but they should not be liable since they are an organization dependent on charity. After series of legal proceedings, the court finally affirmed that precedents would not be followed in the case and that charities, like the hospital, must be liable
It’s important for financial records to be maintained well because if not they could end up in the wrong hands like in the hands of a criminal. If you don’t Handel them properly you could loose all the information in financial records.
<h2>there are two PICTURE </h2>
<h2>i HOPE IT'S HELP </h2>
dont mind wat I am saying i need points
Answer:
Protection against unwanted search and seizure
Explanation:
Freedom of religion wasn't violated because the FBI aren't trying to prevent him from practicing his religion.
Freedom of assembly is wrong because the FBI isn't preventing them from getting each other.
Protection against unlawful accusations is also incorrect because their is no unlawful accusation in intercepting suspicious messages.
This obviously leaves protection against unwarranted searches and seizures because the FBI took Tristians phone without gaining a warrant from a judge that would legally allow them to take it.
