Answer:
Yes. It's also just impolite.
Answer and Explanation:
A. Because plagiarism is a crime and contradicts an attorney's moral and ethical code. This takes away all the credibility of the lawyer, shows that he is not able to hold the position, in addition to showing that he acts in criminal activities of high gravity and therefore must be punished immediately and have his profession questioned.
B. The Iowa court referred to other cases involving plagiarism, which is the practice that allows someone else's works and words to be copied without due credit. Cases of plagiarism are very common and the Iowa court must treat everyone with the same severity in order for them to be fought.
Answer:
The free exercise clause protects the religious beliefs, and to a certain extent, the religious practices of all citizens. The more controversial establishment clause prohibits the government from endorsing, supporting, or becoming too involved in religion and religious activities.
Explanation:
Answer:
The people who most commonly speak at a sentencing hearing are the prosecutors, the defense attorney, the victims, and the defendant. Rule 32 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure grants both the defendant and defense counsel the right to speak to the court before a sentence is imposed. First, even before a defendant appears before a judge, prosecutors may agree, as part of a plea agreement, to recommend a lower sentence or to charge a less serious crime in exchange for the defendant's cooperation.
