WASHINGTON - THE Vietnam War is universally regarded as a disaster for what it did to the American and Vietnamese people. However, 30 years after the war's end, the reasons for its outcome remain a matter of dispute.
The most popular explanation among historians and journalists is that the defeat was a result of American policy makers' cold-war-driven misunderstanding of North Vietnam's leaders as dangerous Communists. In truth, they argue, we were fighting a nationalist movement with great popular support. In this view, "our side," South Vietnam, was a creation of foreigners and led by a corrupt urban elite with no popular roots. Hence it could never prevail, not even with a half-million American troops, making the war "unwinnable."
This simple explanation is repudiated by powerful historical evidence, both old and new. Its proponents mistakenly base their conclusions on the situation in Vietnam during the 1950's and early 1960's and ignore the changing course of the war (notably, the increasing success of President Richard Nixon's Vietnamization strategy) and the evolution of South Vietnamese society (in particular the introduction of agrarian reforms).
For all the claims of popular support for the Vietcong insurgency, far more South Vietnamese peasants fought on the side of Saigon than on the side of Hanoi. The Vietcong were basically defeated by the beginning of 1972, which is why the North Vietnamese launched a huge conventional offensive at the end of March that year. During the Easter Offensive of 1972 -- at the time the biggest campaign of the war -- the South Vietnamese Army was able to hold onto every one of the 44 provincial capitals except Quang Tri, which it regained a few months later. The South Vietnamese relied on American air support during that offensive.
Advertisement
Continue reading the main story
If the United States had provided that level of support in 1975, when South Vietnam collapsed in the face of another North Vietnamese offensive, the outcome might have been at least the same as in 1972. But intense lobbying of Congress by the antiwar movement, especially in the context of the Watergate scandal, helped to drive cutbacks of American aid in 1974. Combined with the impact of the world oil crisis and inflation of 1973-74, the results were devastating for the south. As the triumphant North Vietnamese commander, Gen. Van Tien Dung, wrote later, President Nguyen Van Thieu of South Vietnam was forced to fight "a poor man's war."
Even Hanoi's main patron, the Soviet Union, was convinced that a North Vietnamese military victory was highly unlikely. Evidence from Soviet Communist Party archives suggests that, until 1974, Soviet military intelligence analysts and diplomats never believed that the North Vietnamese would be victorious on the battlefield. Only political and diplomatic efforts could succeed. Moscow thought that the South Vietnamese government was strong enough to defend itself with a continuation of American logistical support. The former Soviet chargé d'affaires in Hanoi during the 1970's told me in Moscow in late 1993 that if one looked at the balance of forces, one could not predict that the South would be defeated. Until 1975, Moscow was not only impressed by American military power and political will, it also clearly had no desire to go to war with the United States over Vietnam. But after 1975, Soviet fear of the United States dissipated.
U.S. troops withdrew from the country. this is answer
A virtue is a desirable trait that between kindness and cowardice an ethic is like a rule or a decision. To make good or cowardly decisions is what an virtue ethic is. A bad ethic can ruin somebodies with fact that these ethical decisions are made when somebody is in trouble or pain. Good ethics are extreme decsions in protecting the harmed even when it means killing or injuring yourself. My best example would be from the true story turned movie about RED Navy Seals sent to kill an Isis leader and they came across villagers and decided not to kill them because they were young and that cost 3 out of the four men their lives. In the process of dying they saved the fourth dude while aware they were about to kill themselves doing so. Best movies ever! Called Lone Survivor. If there is anything that resembles virtue ethics its what the Arabian guy and his village did to help the lone soldier, putting his life in danger. Hopefully you can summarize off of what I said.
Japan has a parliamentary system of government like Britain and Canada. Unlike the Americans or the French, the Japanese do not elect a president directly. Diet members elect a prime minister from among themselves. The prime minister forms and leads the cabinet of ministers of state.
The best answer to the question: His racial-ethnic identity seems to be:___, in regards to Keyshaw, an African American student who starts to realize the differences that exist between himself and his school peers as he became aware of his status as member of an ethnic minority, would be: marginalizing him, or causing marginality.
Explanation:
Ethnicity, and especially ethnic identity when it comes to racial and ethnic minorities, can become a difficult issue to handle in the face of these minorities being in the middle of larger groups of ethnic majority. Keyshaw is an African American, member of a minority, and he becomes aware of this during his school years. When this realization happens, Keyshaw begins to feel different from the others in his group, friends or no friends, and starts to discover that there are other differences that also make him different from the larger group. As a result of this process of awareness, Keyshaw´s ethnic identity is driving him to become isolated, differentiated and marginalized from the larger group, and this is called marginality.
