During the great depression the prices of goods went DOWN, and that made consumers hoard hard cash because they felt the longer they waited the more prices would FALL and this restriction of supply was paradoxically making it more attractive to hoard cash, king of like a monopoly on the supply of money.
On the other hand speculators went bankrupt as deflation made the price of the lender's assets LESS than the value of their loan, which decreased their equity, which meant even if they sold all of their assets they could not pay off their loan, which made the BANKS lose a part of their money, and as the demand for hard cash rose that led more banks to go bankrupt, which in turn led more savers to get their assets in hard cash, paradoxically increasing the rate of bank failure.
My theory is that to stop this paradox from continuing is to cause inflation by literally "making" money, adding it to the Government balance, and that this should have been done immediately. Normal Governments do this all the time during recession, usually in the form of monetary policy by lowering rates and taxes to increase the supply of money in the economy (during boom years they increase taxes and interest rates to restrict the supply of cash and limit inflation). But during the great depression doing this was not enough, lowering rates and taxes was not enough, so in my opinion they should have literally printed off more money, which could then be used for infrastructure programs, which increases supply of money so it was not attractive to hoard money and thus increase supply more, while also increasing the value of properties and so increasing equity and stopping bankruptcies, and in the end this might lead to short term inflation, this could be stopped by higher taxes and rates, and then the Government can permanently remove the money from circulation. The only downside of this system is that it won’t punish the financially “special” people as to dissuade them from being so irresponsible, so the Government may have to adopt an asset tax(?) or something like that so the Government can reimburse, if only a little, the sensible people, as well as implement policy to stop banks from funding such speculation And Please don't be childish and report me I hope this helps
Answer:
Competition.
Explanation:
Competition refers to a relationship between rival organisms whose economic niches overlap with each other. When both organisms compete with each other for the limited resources available in ecosystem.
In the given case, the Sparrows replacing Bluebirds is a result of competition. Because they both share the same ecological niche, they are in competition with each other for the limited resources.
Therefore, competition is the correct answer.
Answer:
Social emigration is considered to be the shifting of people from one area to another in order to get better employment opportunities, to be closer to their loved ones or to enjoy the perks some other place has to offer.
The social and cultural difference that occurs due to emigration are following;
- Increase in population in that area.
- Lack of job opportunities
- The movement of skilled labor from one area to another area causing imbalance.
- Lack of resources due to population over load.
- Intermingling of cultural values, therefore losing authenticity.
- Creation of new genetic mix along with a cultural mix due to intercultural marriages.
Answer:
The difference in how Democrats and Republicans view Vaccines, and who they get their advice from.
Explanation:
I hope this helps, and thanks! Brainliest please! God bless!
Answer:
D. The investigator uses the informed consent process to explain how respondent data will be transmitted from the website to his encrypted database without ever recording respondents' IP addresses, but explains that on the internet confidentiality cannot be absolutely guaranteed.
Explanation:
Keep in mind that breach of information during on-line survey could be the researcher's fault or subject's fault, depending on how they secure their internet connection.
- Method A is not suitable because of this phrase: 'confidentiality cannot be assured' . This will make the subject thinks that the researchers are not taking responsibilities in protecting the information.
-Method B is not suitable because it create a physical location where people could come in and directly steal the data of all the subjects,
- Method C is not suitable because it does not educate the subjects with the possibilities that they can personally made the mistake that can cause the breach of information.
- Method D is the most suitable because it conveys that the research team is making their full efforts to ensure the anonymity of the subjects and also educate them regarding the possibilities of breach information from the subject's mistake. (it would be even better if the investigator advised the subjects to use trusted VPN services.)
