Answer:
Native American identity in the United States is an evolving topic based on the struggle to define "Native American" or "(American) Indian" both for people who consider themselves Native American and for people who do not. Some people seek an identity that will provide for a stable definition for legal, social, and personal purposes. There are a number of different factors which have been used to define "Indianness," and the source and potential use of the definition play a role in what definition is used. Facets which characterize "Indianness" include culture, society, genes/biology, law, and self-identity.[1] An important question is whether the definition should be dynamic and changeable across time and situation, or whether it is possible to define "Indianness" in a static way.[2] The dynamic definitions may be based in how Indians adapt and adjust to dominant society, which may be called an "oppositional process" by which the boundaries between Indians and the dominant groups are maintained. Another reason for dynamic definitions is the process of "ethnogenesis", which is the process by which the ethnic identity of the group is developed and renewed as social organizations and cultures evolve.[2] The question of identity, especially aboriginal identity, is common in many societies worldwide.
The future of their identity is extremely important to Native Americans. Activist Russell Means spoke frequently about the crumbling Indian way of life, the loss of traditions, languages, and sacred places. He was concerned that there may soon be no more Native Americans, only "Native American Americans, like Polish Americans and Italian Americans." As the number of Indians has grown (ten times as many today as in 1890), the number who carry on tribal traditions shrinks (one fifth as many as in 1890), as has been common among many ethnic groups over time. Means said, "We might speak our language, we might look like Indians and sound like Indians, but we won’t be Indians."
Explanation:
Sorry i know this is long. Hope it helps though
Answer:
The basic reason for which the United States supported the Panamanian rebels was the US's desire to build a canal across the Isthmus of Panama. The US had been negotiating with Colombia for the right to build this canal. However, the Colombian Senate overwhelmingly rejected the treaty that would have given the US this right.
Hope this helped. Can you mark my answer as Brainliest please? Ty! <3 .
Explanation:
Clay. Mesopotamia<span> was a region which did not have many natural </span>resources<span>. ... there needed to </span>trade<span> with neighbouring countries in order to acquire the </span>resources<span> they ... to foreign cities and exchanged for timber, wine, precious metals and </span>stones<span>.</span>
Explanation:
that's when the French colonial rule began in 1858
Both systems try to make government more efficient. Both systems have an elected group that makes laws for the city. Both systems have a weak mayor.Only the council-manager system uses a professional city manager.<span>Only the commission system has commissioners that specialize in one aspect of city government</span>
