Im pretty sure the answer is D
Answer: Because it showed that change is possible
Explanation/context:
The medieval era had been one in which the Roman Catholic Church dominated the culture of Europe, and it was thought that no one could successfully challenge such a deeply ingrained institution. However, the Reformation movement by Martin Luther and other Protestant figures showed that even something as entrenched and enduring at the Catholic Church could be challenged, and changes could be accomplished. Even during Martin Luther's lifetime, this idea that change was possible motivated people to launch efforts toward other major changes to powerful systems. The Peasants Revolt that occurred in Germany in 1524-1525 took Luther's push for reform in the church and applied it to make a push for change in feudal society. Martin Luther himself didn't agree with that and opposed the Peasants Revolt, but as Schaff points out, the momentum of the Reformation was a "propelling force" inspiring other "forward movements" to make changes in society.
Answer:
Explanation:
they disliked leadership within the indians
The EIC arrived as traders and eventually took over the entire subcontinent . Indians had plenty of reasons to dislike the british
1.The simla deputation favored Muslims
2. They were Heavily Persecuted after the war of 1857
BTW plz mention specific year
Jawaharlal Nehru:
Worked closely with Gandhi in the Indian Independence struggle, First prime minister of independent India, Became leader of the Indian National Congress
Muhammad Ali Jinnah:
Became leader of the Muslim League in India, Wanted to create a separate Islamic nation.
I looked all the answers up to make sure I was right.
