Answer:
a and c is the answer of this question
You're demonstrating effective listening skills
listening skills are skills to listen well and understand well what people are saying, and you can demonstrate them by repeating in your words what was said: this shows you understood what was said, since you couldn't do it without properly understanding him
Answer:
It is here where the king makes a connection between the size of Gulliver and other humans and their moral weakness. He Is obviously disgusted at the human thirst for power and at what lengths are we willing to take it:
"The king was struck by horror by the description I had given of those terrible engines, at the proposal I had made. He was amazed how so impotent and groveling an insect as I could entertain such inhuman ideas, and in so familiar a manner as to appear wholly unmoved at all the scenes of blood and desolation, which I had painted as the common effects of those destructive machines."
Explanation:
"Gulliver's Travels", a novel from 1726, is divided in four parts: by Lemuel Gulliver, first a surgeon, and then a captain of several ships by the Irish writer and clergyman Jonathan Swift, a full-length prose satire on both human nature and the "travellers' tales". In this novel the theme is moral correctness vs mental or physical strength, and it as a classic of English literature "to vex the world rather than divert it" turning to an immediate universally read success masterpiece.
Answer:
The correct answer is C) Logical Thought.
Explanation:
Logical thought or logical thinking is a set of cognitive processes in which a person uses reasoning in a consistent manner with the goal of forming conclusions.
There are mainly two types of logical reasoning one called deductive and the other one is called inductive. Both allow the individual to come to certain conclusions.
In this particular case, the act of negotiating trades and developing strategies for improving collections are important exercises in that type of reasoning.
Therefore the correct answer is C) Logical thought.
In Schenck v. the United States (1919), the Supreme Court ruled that criticism of the draft was NOT protected by the First Amendment, because it created a clear and present danger to American interests.
- In the Schenk v. US case, which concerns the freedom of speech issue, Schenk urged Americans to forgo the World War I draft.
- The Supreme Court concluded in Schenck v. the United States that the First Amendment did not apply to criticism of the draft because it posed a clear and present danger to American interests.
- The U.S. Supreme Court heard a First Amendment challenge to federal legislation on free speech grounds for the first time in this case.
Learn about more Supreme Court here
brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
