1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Schach [20]
1 year ago
7

In schenck v. us (1919), the supreme court ruled that congress could ban certain types of speech in times of war if they constit

uted a?
Social Studies
1 answer:
OLEGan [10]1 year ago
7 0

In Schenck v. the United States (1919), the Supreme Court ruled that criticism of the draft was NOT protected by the First Amendment, because it created a clear and present danger to American interests.

  • In the Schenk v. US case, which concerns the freedom of speech issue, Schenk urged Americans to forgo the World War I draft.
  • The Supreme Court concluded in Schenck v. the United States that the First Amendment did not apply to criticism of the draft because it posed a clear and present danger to American interests.
  • The U.S. Supreme Court heard a First Amendment challenge to federal legislation on free speech grounds for the first time in this case.

Learn about more Supreme Court here

brainly.com/question/18228641

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
______ is a shared set of beliefs, values, knowledge, and patterns of behavior common to a group of people.
sergejj [24]

Answer: Culture

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
What was the German point of view regarding the Treaty of Versailles?
mote1985 [20]

Answer:

I have don't understand the question

7 0
2 years ago
Why are media potentially so effective?
julsineya [31]

Answer:

D. all of the above

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When an injured party knows that a substantial and apparent risk is associated with certain conduct, and the party goes ahead wi
Anvisha [2.4K]

Answer:

assumption of the risk

Explanation:

Here the assumption of risk is applied as the party who is injured is already aware of the risk but still wants to continue with the dangerous activity according to his wish. Also this doctrine does not permit an individual to recover the injuries i.e. substained as the party is already exposed himself for a danger

In addition to this, the risk of harm already built in the activity and the injured party also wants to participated in this kind of activity where he is well known

Therefore the given situation represent the assumption of the risk

7 0
3 years ago
The present is the key to the past" is a condensed formulation of:
aleksandr82 [10.1K]

Answer:

b. The principle of uniformitarianism

Explanation:

The present is the key to the past" is a condensed formulation of the principle of uniformitarianism.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is a forum useful to a city
    15·2 answers
  • Which technological development led to an increased demand for slaves in the United States during the early- to mid-1800s?
    14·1 answer
  • ___________________________ is a threat to validity that implies that a test is too narrow and fails to include important dimens
    10·1 answer
  • What role did nature play in the religious ideas of Native Americans?
    14·1 answer
  • Here is the whole thing sorry
    12·1 answer
  • The united states has a federalist system this means that
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements was true about mountain men?
    9·1 answer
  • Why is surveying an important step in active reading? Group of answer choices
    7·1 answer
  • Julia (S25, P18, TR16, C24) intentionally uses her Learning Patterns while reading her text. Identifying the important terms tha
    5·1 answer
  • What are jobs of three branches of government?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!