1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dimas [21]
2 years ago
15

PLS ANSWER FAST!! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!

Mathematics
1 answer:
horrorfan [7]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

500^1/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Since it is a cube root, the exponent is 1/3.

You might be interested in
HELP ASAP 10 POINTSSSS
dlinn [17]
Answer:
Y= -4 :)

Steps:
Apply rule
-y + 3 = 7
Subtract 3 from both sides
-y + 3 - 3 = 7 - 3
Simplify
-y = 4
Divide both sides by -1
-y/-1 = 4/-1
Simplify
y = -4

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
It takes 45 minutes for 4 people to paint 5 walls how long does it take 6 people to paint 4 walls
Naily [24]

Answer:

54 Minutes

Step-by-step explanation:

45 minutes/5 walls/4 people=2.25 minutes per person per wall

2.25 times 6 times 4=54 minutes

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
45% of what number is 63
ollegr [7]

Answer:

140.

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What is the volume of the prism picture below
oksano4ka [1.4K]

Answer:

i think its 18.59

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
A group of students was discussing the meaning of this statement. They were arguing back and forward about whether the converse
Savatey [412]

Answer:

The statement is missing. The statement is -- "A ray can be part of a line."

The answer is : The converse is not true, so Jahmiah is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

A conditional statement is represented by showing p → q. It means if p is correct or true,  then q is also correct or true.

And the converse of p → q can be shown as  q → p.

But we know that the converse of a statement is not always true, it may be true and may not be true.

In the context, the statement is " a ray can be a part of a line." And so the converse would be  "A line can be a part of the ray".

So by definition we know that a line is continuous line having no end points, it extends in one direction. While a ray starts from a point and extends to infinity in one direction.

Thus ray is part of line but line is not a part of the ray. So the converse of the statement is not correct.

Hence, Jahmiah is correct.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do you find the phase shift of the trig function y=4sin(pieX+2)-5
    14·1 answer
  • 10^1 has what place value?
    11·2 answers
  • Find the slope......
    6·1 answer
  • Multiply the following numbers. Reduce the answer to lowest terms. 3 1/4 · 1 1/3
    5·1 answer
  • 6 + 3x = 2(2 + x) ?​
    11·1 answer
  • Find the length of AC. <br> (Need help asap)
    7·1 answer
  • What is the area of the parallelogram?​
    9·2 answers
  • Draw an area model and then solve using the standard algorithm
    14·1 answer
  • Can you please solve it
    13·1 answer
  • Please help and view image below!!
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!