It offers a major leverage point for dealing
with the bombardment of the following historical information.
Answer:
Parliament responded to the protests against the Tea Act by passing the Intolerable Acts.
Explanation:
The Intolerable Acts was the name given to the laws issued in 1774 by the British Parliament due to continued discontent in the Thirteen Colonies, particularly in Boston after turbulent incidents such as the Tea Party. These acts accelerated the processes that culminated in the War of Independence of the United States and the formation of the First Continental Congress.
The acts had different consequences. The Massachusetts Government Act undid representative government and also decreed that political posts in colonial government were elected by Great Britain. The Administration of Justice Act authorized the Governor of Massachusetts the right to transfer any judgment to Great Britain and authorized coercive actions to give witnesses to the case. The Boston Port Act closed the Port of Boston until it was paid for damages for the Tea Party in Boston, though it was never done. The Quartering Act declared that the British troops not only had to lodge in commercial and empty buildings, but also in private houses.
The Intolerable Acts were also a determining factor for the convening of the First Continental Congress and the Declaration of Rights and Grievances. The Continental Congress rejected the Intolerable Acts when creating the Continental Association. The aim was to boycott British goods and if that failed to force Parliament to remove the tax records, then it would stop exporting to Britain.
The statement "Not all share-to-share files are protected from copyright infringement actions." is a TRUE statement
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is copyright infringement?</h3>
Generally, Infringement of someone's copyright occurs when that person uses or produces anything that is copyright covered without first receiving consent from the owner of the copyright.
Violation of a patent occurs when a third party violates the rights that are granted to the owner of the copyright. These rights may include the right to make sole use of a work for a certain amount of time.
In conclusion, It is a FACT that the phrase "Copyright infringement measures may be taken against some but not all share-to-share files." is a valid statement.
Read more about Copyright infringement
brainly.com/question/16774161
#SPJ1
Answer: The answer should be D if it's not I am truly sorry, if you are a fellow FLVS user, I will feel guilty about this, but i'd give it a try.
