Answer:
A.
Explanation:
He is a quiet person, and doesnt enjoy talking in public. Same here with me.
Answer:
Ulysses S. Grant was the most acclaimed Union general during the American Civil War[1] and was twice elected President. Grant began his military career as a cadet at the United States Military Academy at West Point in 1839. After graduation he went on to serve with distinction as a lieutenant in the Mexican–American War. Grant was a keen observer of the war and learned battle strategies serving under Generals Zachary Taylor and Winfield Scott. After the war Grant served at various posts especially in the Pacific Northwest; he was forced to retire from the service in 1854 due to accusations of drunkenness.[2] He was unable to make a success of farming and on the onset of the Civil War in April 1861, Grant was working as a clerk in his father's leather goods store in Galena, Illinois. When the war began his military experience was needed, and Congressman Elihu B. Washburne became his patron in political affairs and promotions in Illinois and nationwide.
Grant trained Union military recruits and was promoted to Colonel in June 1861. Maj. Gen. John C. Frémont, who viewed in Grant an "iron will" to win, appointed Grant to commander of the District of Cairo. Grant became famous around the nation after capturing Fort Donelson in February 1862 and was promoted to Major General by President Abraham Lincoln. After a series of decisive yet costly battles and victories at Shiloh, Vicksburg, and Chattanooga, Grant was promoted to Lieutenant General by President Lincoln in 1864 and given charge of all the Union Armies. Grant went on to defeat Robert E. Lee after another series of costly battles in the Overland Campaign, Petersburg, and Appomattox. After the Civil War, Grant was given his final promotion of General of the Armed Forces in 1866 and served until 1869. Grant's popularity as a Union war general enabled him to be elected two terms as the 18th President of the United States.
Some historians have viewed Grant as a "butcher" commander who in 1864 used attrition without regard to the lives of his own soldiers in order to kill off the enemy which could no longer replenish its losses.[3] Throughout the Civil War Grant's armies incurred approximately 154,000 casualties, while having inflicted 191,000 casualties on his opposing Confederate armies.[4] In terms of success, Grant was the only general during the Civil War who received the surrender of three Confederate armies.[3] Although Grant maintained high casualties during the Overland Campaign in 1864, his aggressive fighting strategy was in compliance with the U.S. government's strategic war aims.[3] Grant has recently been praised by historians for his "military genius", and viewed as a decisive general who emphasized movement and logistics.[5] Grant is considered Americas' first modern general, leading from a central command center, using common sense, and delivering coordinated attacks on the enemies armies.
Explanation:
brainliest answer pls and i give ROBUX
Answer:
They gained control by being one extra step ahead, because of their big army, and slowly taking over their land.
Explanation:
Hope this helps plz mark brainliest
All of them were split because each of those countries were being controlled by the big four which were the former allies. Hope that helps
District of Columbia's gun control laws were the subject of a 2008 supreme court decision that ruled for an individual right to possess a firearm for lawful purposes.
What is the District of Columbia v. Heller case?
In the case of District of Columbia v. Heller, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on June 26, 2008, by a vote of 5 to 4, that the Second Amendment guarantees a person's right to own firearms without having to participate in a state militia and to use firearms for conventionally legal purposes, such as self-defense inside the home. The Second Amendment's interpretation was examined in this case for the first time since the United
The case known as District of Columbia v. Heller was first brought in 2003 in the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. In Parker v. District of Columbia, six residents of the federal District of Columbia asked the court to block the implementation of three provisions of the district's Firearms Control Regulation Act (1975), which generally forbade the registration of handguns, forbade the carrying of unlicensed handguns or any other "deadly or dangerous" weapon that could be concealed, and demanded that legally stored firearms be disassembled or locked to prevent firing.
Know more about USA gun rights
brainly.com/question/3563382
#SPJ4
