1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Juliette [100K]
2 years ago
7

What do Supreme Court judges do after they’ve heard oral arguments from lawyers about the cases before them? veto the law delibe

rate the case listen to victim advocates issue a sentence
Law
1 answer:
Gekata [30.6K]2 years ago
4 0

Explanation:

give a criminal its punishment

You might be interested in
In what way did larger states feel they were disadvantaged by the articles of confederation leading them to push for the constit
labwork [276]

Answer:

they wanted to be thier own country but america didn't let that happen

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What are the steps for making a smooth stop?
scZoUnD [109]

Answer:

Don't keep going

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A country's government is worried that it has become too reliant on foreign goods. It wants to encourage its citizens to buy pro
Akimi4 [234]

Answer:

Quotas

Explanation:

just did on a-p-e-x

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which law made it harder for some europeans to immigrate to the united states and easier for others?
photoshop1234 [79]

Answer:

The Johnson-Reed Immigration Act , 1924

Explanation:

The Johnson-Reed Immigration Act was passed making it harder for some Europeans to immigrate to the US, and made somewhat easier for other countries to move the US

The Immigration Act of 1924, also called as the Johnson-Reed Act, was a law of the federal that was passed on May 16, 1924 in the USA intended to limit immigration of population in the US. It, the law banned entry of the entire Chinese population and put strict restrictions to other Asian immigrant groups, and to a fewer extent, on people from Eastern and Southern Europe; but it did not apply to persons from the American continent.

6 0
3 years ago
The supreme court case worcester v. Georgia was a small victory for the cherokee nation in georgia because it
Blababa [14]

Answer:

The Case of the Supreme Court Worcester v. Georgia was a small victory for the Cherokee nation in Georgia because it was decided that Georgia laws did not apply to Cherokee territory.

Explanation:

In the Worcester case v. Georgia, the Supreme Court denied Georgia jurisdiction and state authority over the Cherokee community. In other words, this meant that Georgia law and authority did not apply to Cherokee territory. Although this decision was a small victory for the Cherokee people, the decision was not very helpful as the state of Georgia totally ignored the Supreme Court decision and forced the Cherokee community to march west.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Define the following terms:
    5·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP
    9·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP! IS THIS RIGHT??
    5·1 answer
  • Discuss some of the advantages and disadvantages of the reparations Germany paid at the end of World War I. Why do you think the
    7·1 answer
  • Why might a social epidemiologist study the mass media?
    12·2 answers
  • The Necessary and Proper Clause is significant because it gives congress:
    5·1 answer
  • Charlie Jones was caught smoking meth by the police. They arrested him and put him in custody. He was convicted as a felon and o
    10·1 answer
  • Approaches of democracy
    5·1 answer
  • Some attorneys contact many experts as a ploy to disqualify them or prevent opposing counsel from hiring them; this practice is
    10·1 answer
  • Explain in detail the two types of voting system
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!