Answer:
when your aressted
Explanation:
To incite actions that would harm others (e.g., “[S]hout[ing] 'fire' in a crowded theater.”). Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919). To make or distribute obscene materials.
Answer:
If you are deaf and communicate with sign language:
You may request that PennDOT provide an interpreter for the Knowledge and/or Road Test
Explanation:
It is the responsibility of public institutions to provide an interpreter if a deaf person must communicate with sign language. However, it seems that payment for the service must be borne by the person requesting for the service. The request must be placed two weeks in advance to ensure that necessary arrangements are made for the purpose. Only certified and registered sign language interpreters are allowed for the Knowledge and/or Road Test.
Explanation:
bankruptcy cases would be heard in a federal court
The legal advice that would be given here would depend on whether or not the person who accepted to purchase the shock absorber acted as an agent or broker.
<h3>Who is an agent or broker?</h3>
A broker is described as a person or organization that negotiates contracts and serves as a middleman between a buyer and a seller in exchange for a fee.
A broker is a non-party to a transaction and is distinct from an agent, who represents the primary party in a transaction.
It is important to note that the element that changes the equation is whether or not the "someone" carried out the above transaction for a fee to them.
If they did, the they may be liable to ensure that you got proper value for money. If not, then they are not liable, they were simply acting on your instruction.
Another line of recourse would be to check the warranties and guaranties given on the product that was purchased.
Learn more about agency:
brainly.com/question/23534924
#SPJ1
Answer: in our country, any proposal to amend the Constitution is idle because it’s effectively impossible….The Founders made the amendment process difficult because they wanted to lock in the political deals that made ratification of the Constitution possible. Moreover, they recognized that, for a government to function well, the ground rules should be stable. But they also understood that the people will need to change those ground rules as new challenges and problems surface with the passage of time….But the Founders blundered. They made passing an amendment too hard….In setting the bar so high, the Framers didn’t foresee that as the country became more populous and diverse, it would become harder for people to reach the near-consensus required for change.”
