Answer:Official filing with the Secretary of State
Explanation:
This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Cases such as Loving v. Virginia and Griswold v. Connecticut illustrate that:______
a) the Supreme Court will rarely strike down laws passed directly by voters through the initiative process
b) the Supreme Court has the authority to overturn state statutes that contravene rights and privileges guaranteed under the Constitution
c) the Supreme Court does not have the authority to overturn state statutes
d) the Supreme Court does not have the authority to strike down sections of state constitutions
Answer: b) the Supreme Court has the authority to overturn state statutes that contravene rights and privileges guaranteed under the Constitution
Explanation:
In Loving v. Virginia, the Supreme Court ruled the anti-miscegenation statutes that outlawed interracial marriage, such as was the case in Virginia, unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment.
In Griswold v. State of Connecticut, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Connecticut’s birth control law was unconstitutional because it infringed the Fourth and Fifth amendments
Answer:
It is important because in law enforcement you have to learn to treat everyone equality and you also have to learn that not everyone is the same so you have to adjust your lifestyles to how the law wants you to.
Explanation:
I really hope this made sense lol
Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, it is a felony for an auditor to willfully fail to maintain proper records of audits and work papers for at least five years.
Option d
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 is a federal act providing rigorous auditing of government corporations ' banking regulations. Legislators also produced legislation to ensure safety for investors, employees and the community from accounting irregularities and dishonest financial practices.
Sarbanes-Oxley offers for a new act entitled "Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act 2002" (CCFA Act), which promises to change federal criminal law to the following:
-
Prohibit anyone from intentionally changing, damage, mutilation, and covering, cover-up, falsifying or accessing any documents in a matter that is within the competence of any government agency or any federal bankrupt case, obstructing or affecting an inquiry.
- Forbid an auditor from intentionally or inadvertently not holding any inspection or examination papers relating to a government undertaking over a five-year period although it's not a felony for Sarbanes-Oxley to hold these working papers for at least 5 years, over seven years, the auditors must retain their records.
Answer:
Communities operate in the context of federal and state policies that can affect local government decisions relevant to health through laws and regulations, through the allocation of resources, and by shaping political will on issues and approaches. Among the more widely recognized policies are those that fund or regulate health care delivery services. But policies in a variety of areas, ranging from education to land use and housing, the environment, and criminal justice, can be relevant to health disparities. Policies can vary significantly across geographic areas and over time in establishing priorities, providing funding, or encouraging collaboration. They can provide important opportunities or constitute barriers to promoting health equity. The policy context shapes the levers that are available to communities to address change.
It seems reasonable to assume that the better informed communities are about the implications of federal and state policy and policy changes, the greater their ability will be to respond effectively to address health disparities and help achieve change in the determinants of health. And, conversely, the more the needs of communities are considered in decision making at the federal and state levels, the more effective those policies will be. In other words, policy makers have the opportunity to lay the groundwork for community success. This policy context (i.e., socioeconomic and political drivers) is highlighted in the report’s conceptual model in Figure
