Herbert Hoover lost by a narrow margin
In the Declaration of Independence, one opposing claim Jefferson anticipates is that prudence would "dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes". Indeed, he says, and experience demonstrates that mankind would take all of the suffers, as long they are bearable, before changing the Government to which they are used to. But when a long trail of abuses and usurpations makes that Government despotic and not the system that guarantees the rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, it is the duty of men to take down that government and establish a new one that guarantees those rights. And so he lists the abuses that the King's ruling has inflicted upon the colonies, such as imposing taxes, cutting off their trade, dissolving Representatives Houses when it didn't follow his wishes, and not re-establishing them after a long time, etc.
Jefferson is trying to demonstrate why it is fair and justifiable that the colonies break free from the English ruling after it didn't stop with its tyrannical actions towards them, when the colonists has petitioned it in the most humble way. If the civilized and lawful approaches weren't enough to reform the regime, then it is fair to take it down and build a new one.
The correct answer is Option A: because people of the world- including dissenters in Germany- has approved their cause.
Joesph Stalin justified the war of Soviet Union with Hitler's Germany because he believed that everyone was on his side. He believed the world had approved his cause to fight tyranny.
He also believed many Germans did not like Hitler and were also supportive of his cause.
We should not forget that the people of Soviet Union were already supporting Stalin.
An Incan citade in the Andes mountains in Peru. (Above the Urubamba River Valley) The original use of it is not known, but we do know it was built in the 15th century.
