In September 1939 with the beginning of World War II German U-boat operations got under way against allied forces the allies responded to the U-boat threat with a number of counter measures
<span>The combined affect of protection of ships by convoys harassment of U-boats by airplanes and other anti-submarine warfare measures reduced the ability of the U-boats to cut Britain off from her </span>
<span>suppliers in North America In order to assess the effectiveness of the allied response it is first necessary to look at the U-boats In looking at the U-boats it is not only necessary to look at the </span>
<span>various types of U-boats and their deployment but also to look at the Germans goals and the tactics that they employed in an attempt to reach those goals </span>
<span>The Treaty of Versailles ending world war one prohibited Germany from having any U-boats When the treaty was changed under The Anglo-German Naval agreement one of the things that the </span>
<span>Germans did to rebuild their navy was to rebuild the U-boat wing Their first U-boats were for general sea-going and coastal abilities the U-boats first built for this purpose were types I and II The type I had a surface speed of 1775 knots and 825 knots submerged on electric engines for armament it had 41 inch </span>
<span>and 22 mm anti-aircraft guns and six torpedoes In comparison the type II had speeds of 13 knots surfaced and 7 knots submerged with three torpedoes and one 20 mm anti-aircraft gun The type II was </span>
<span>smaller than the type I </span>
1) I Love Lucy. One of the most successful television series.
2) The Honeymooners. The Honeymooners is a sitcom that starred Jackie Gleason as Ralph Kramden and so many more famous actors.
3) Father Knows Best. Father Knows Best is a radio and television comedy series
Answer:
Thomas Gibbons won the case Gibbons v. Ogden in 1824 because he <em><u>held a federal license to do business.</u></em>
Explanation:
The Supreme Court case of Gibbons v. Ogden was a case of a territorial issue where the two parties tried to gain superior authority over the rights involved. This court case set the precedent for how state and federal powers are entertained.
Aaron Ogden and Thomas Gibbons were former partners in the steamboat industry. So, when Gibbons got his own steamboat to operate, the issue of who can ply in the waterways became an issue. Ogden has a state permit while Gibbons's was a federal permit.
When Gibbons operates his steamboat on the waterways of New York, Ogden opposed, claiming that Gibbons has no permit. This case became a fight between the state and federal powers, with the issue of who was to have a higher power. And the court agreed or dictated that the federal government has control or precedence over the state.
So, <u>Gibbons won the case because of his federal licence against Ogden's state licence</u>.
