Answer: Because knowing the people who are part of the government allows them to know who is doing a good job for the nation and who is not.
Explanation:
Some people underestimate the importance of knowing who are the people who over the years are part of the presidential cabinet when in reality it should be the opposite. Every citizen must know the political history of his country so that in the future he will not repeat those disasters that at some time could lead the nation to its economic and social loss.
The government is responsible for the welfare of citizens. It is responsible for making decisions that contribute to the growth of the nation. When a ruler does not fulfill what was promised and only occupies positions for its benefit, citizens know that this type of person should not be the president of the nation. This helps them know who they should choose in the future.
Citizens are responsible for choosing who will be their rulers, so people must know the political and professional trajectory that future candidates have and thus be able to determine who will do a good job and who will not.
A town that does not stay informed tends to fail. Make bad decisions and then be sorry for what they have done. They blame the people in power, but forget that it was they who put those leaders in government.
Each of the leaders who have ruled a country marks a before and after. They leave changes in the country that can be both positive and negative, the people must follow up to think that it is in fact that it is convenient for them. Citizens must know all the steps that governments are taking since certain decisions can negatively influence the country and citizens are those who have to pay the consequences.
Answer:
That sounds like the old Keynesian idea made popular during Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal: Cut taxes and increase government spending to “prime the pump” during a recession; raise taxes and reduce spending to slow down an “overheated” economy. Keynesianism seemed to have been finally laid to rest in the 1980s when President Ronald Reagan argued for a tax cut on supply‐side grounds, and even liberal economists now agree that such fine‐tuning has little effect on the economy.
Explanation:
1. In a free country, money belongs to the people who earn it. The most fundamental reason to cut taxes is an understanding that wealth doesn’t just happen, it has to be produced. And those who produce it have a right to keep it. We may agree to give up a portion of the wealth we create in order to pay for such public goods as national defense and a system of justice. But we don’t give the government an unlimited claim on our money to use as it sees fit.
.................by regarding it as a collection of RESOURCES,...................
Resources refers to the substances found in the environments which are useful to the people economically and technologically; it is also socially acceptable for use by the people. Resources can be found in diverse places, such as in the ground, in the water and on the land.
The correct answer is (B) barometer
I'm not sure of the exact word you are looking for, but the general idea is that the federal law will always reign supreme if there is ever a conflict between the federal and state laws. Federal law is superior or higher-ranking or more preferable, etc.
Here is the exact phrasing from Article VI of the US Constitution: "This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding."
