Answer:
No, because marriage is a public and not a private fact.
Explanation:
From the question we are informed about Alice who was briefly married at the age of 16. She is now 28 years old and plans to marry Henry in the spring. Henry's sister found out about Alice's first marriage and then told Henry's parents. Alice now wants to sue Henry's sister for public disclosure of private facts. In this case, Alice does not have a case against Henry's sister because marriage is considered a public and not not considered a private fact. Private facts can be regarded ones personal details which has not been disclosed in the public domain. These could be private romantic encounter or someone sexual orientation. Immediately this personal details get disclosed publicly by the person, it is considered as "public fact" because it has moved into the public domain. Public disclosure of fact is passing across of fact-at-issue on to public, so that the fact can public knowledge.
Sedimentary rock would not form.
Since Sedimentary rock wouldn't form the formation of igneous and metamorphic rock would be affected too.
Answer:
The licensee will be held liable
Explanation:
The reason why he/she will be held liable is because of misrepresentation of facts. it is of the interest of the licensee to make sure that all the facts and documents represented in the details of license is understood before any other formalities.
If there is a misrepresentation from the part of the licensee, he will be held liable and on this note, the misrepresentation comes from the licensee without the owners knowledge is very very bad , that is why the licensee will be held liable.
They both are important trading areas
In other words can live by him/her self independently idk what they are described as hmm idk say integrated