Answer:
a. How will the $20,000 payments be treated by Fred and Tammy if covered by prior law? b. How will the payments be treated if the divorce is covered by new law? c. What is Tammy's basis in the residence? d. What role would a tax adviser play in a divorce?
Explanation:
a. For Fred, the 20,000 must be included in income. There is no deduction for paying alimony. For Tammy, the amount is not included in income.
b. If the divorce was complete prior to December 31, 2018, Fred can deduct the $20,000 payments as alimony.
If the divorce was complete prior to December 31, 2018, Tammy must include the $20,000 payments in gross income.
c. It's $100.000,00
d. Tax advisors are responsible for determining the value of property given in lieu of cash for an alimony payment.
The answer is A is just is because it's logic
Answer:
True
Explanation:
It is TRUE that the shift from periodic social drinking to substance abuse evolves to meet a person's need for "comfort and esteem."
According to various research findings, the people that move from periodic social drinking to substance abuse usually do such due to the need to give themselves comfort when they are suffering from one sad moment or depression.
The other way people change from periodic drinking to substance abuse is to elevate their self-esteem, especially when they are low on confidence.
Hence, in this case, the statement is TRUE.
