Answer: False
Explanation:
The statement that "Under the US structure and operation of government each state can make, enforce and intrepret its own laws even if the laws are inconsistent with another state's laws or federal law" is false.
Even though state governments have the right to prescribe certain policy on education, taxation, commerce etc, it should be noted that such laws should not contradict the federal laws.
According to the Constitution of the United States, the federal law is being regarded as the supreme law and no.other state can contradict what it says.
Answer:
Loose constructionism is an ideological position of legal interpretation (especially of the Constitution) by means of which the judges have the power not only to judge compliance with the different laws, but also to interpret the text of the legal provisions of the Constitution, defining its scope and content.
Two arguments in favor of this position are, on the one hand, that the Constitution is not a rigid law but that it is constantly being modified through jurisprudential interpretations, with which it is necessary for judges to be able to interpret its clauses in a lax way; and on the other, that a rigid Constitution would be easily set aside by society, since it would not adapt to changes in circumstances on its part.
Answer:
The session that Dan is required to attend is:
Victim-offender mediation session.
Explanation:
Victim-offender mediation (VOM) session is a mediation session (also called a meeting, conference, or reconciliation) between a victim and an offender to bring about restorative justice for the victim. The VOM process provides interested victims the opportunity to meet the offenders in safe and structured environments. Every VOM session tries to provide the victim with the necessary support that they require to voice their views about the crime and to receive some answers from the offender. During the session, the offender will outline restitution plans, while the mediator ensures that the offender complies with the plans. Otherwise, the court will intervene with full legal force.
Answer:
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Explanation:
Biological explanations are sometimes used in order to explain the reasons for a crime. However, although this might appear to be a good idea on the surface, it can actually carry a great variety of problems. When we accept biological explanations, we are giving great respect and consideration to science. Although this is not necessarily bad, excessive respect for science can make us this that this is objective, when it is not. It can also make us forget that scientific interpretations can be polluted due to bias, misunderstandings and misinterpretation of evidence, to name a few. This could affect policy development, policing, and the adjudication of offenders, as scientific concerns would be placed much higher up than ethical or social concerns.
