Answer:c
Explanation:
you always put a parthacize after it so it can make sense
Answer:
Opposite of extrude is <em>intrude.</em>
Explanation:
Extrude= Force out/come out
Intrude=Go in/Force in
Answer:
"The Man in the Arena"
The title of the real speech was "Citizenship In A Republic."
Explanation:
"Citizenship In A Republic" was a speech presented by Theodore Roosevelt at the Sorbonne, in Paris, France on April 23, 1910.
I decided to pick this text because of the title in this assignment. "The Man in the Arena" as a title evokes some emotions. Ordinarily, without reading the main speech, it shows that somebody is urging somebody to rise up to the occasion and remain faithful. It looks as if Theodore Roosevelt was given a particular title topic to deliver his speech on. But, he would have preferred an emotional title like "The Man in the Arena."
Going through his speech proper, you discover that he encouraged the men who were involved in building their French nation to continue to exert efforts, warning against benchwarming by those who comfortably sat on the fence.
Take a look at this. "The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat."
Answer: ok ill try, but this is from my perspective so you might have different answers. also im writing a shorter essay and not a real one, this is just an example :)
Explanation:
Italian political writer, Niccolo Machiavelli's ideas on how political leaders should act isn't very admirable from my stance. Though we should have high expectations for political leaders, I disagree with his statements and think he is wrong. We should expect our political leaders to be virtuous as well as effective. I feel that we should be realistic when discussing politics like he states and that rulers should be filled with power and success, but those aren't the only two traits they should uphold. Contradictory to what Machiavelli thinks, I think both virtue and effectiveness are both important skills a leader needs to have, and I think that rulers should be more than just concerned with power and triumph.
