I don't know but the tower of the empire
Answer:
World War 1 vs World War 2
• WW1 was mainly confined to Europe while WW2 had entire world as its theater.
• Warfare and arms used in WW1 were primitive in nature and the war was mainly fought digging trenches. On the other hand, airpower was heavily used in WW2 with atom bombs dropped in Japan being termed as the Holocaust.
• Radio got invented which was heavily used in WW2 while there were only landline phones in WW1
• Germany suffered defeats in both WW1 and WW2 but while it wisely acknowledged defeat in WW1, Hitler chose to fight till the bitter end in WW2 leading to mass destruction
• WW2 saw 7 times more casualties than WW1
• There was only Mustard gas as WMD in WW2 while Atom bombs were used for the first and last time as WMD in WW2
• League of Nations was born with the end of WW1 while the end of WW2 gave birth to United Nations
• WW1 was based on imperialism while WW2 was a result of the clash of ideologies
Explanation:
monetary inflation occurring at a very high rate
The idea that imperialism provided both a commercial and strategic advantage to the United States.
The belief that the power comes from the consent of the governed.
The preservation of the exceptionalism nature of the United States.
Answer: Options 1, 4 and 6.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Imperialism was when a country expanded it's influence on the other countries of the world. The influence was spread in the form of economic and the military power over the other countries of the world.
The imperialism of the United States helped it to gain economic strength, because the country which were under the control of the country proved to be a market for the country. Moreover they thought that theirs nation was special and had to spread its virtue far and wide.
<span>Mahan argued that British control of the seas, combined with a corresponding decline in the naval strength of its major European rivals, paved the way for Great Britain’s emergence as the world’s dominant military, political, and economic power. Mahan and some leading American politicians believed that these lessons could be applied to U.S. foreign policy, particularly in the quest to expand U.S. markets overseas.</span>
