Answer:
Hmm.
Explanation:
No? Maybe.
I am feeling conflicted here. I want to sacrifice my life so others can have a better one, but I don't know if I am willing to sacrifice my life for random people/person.
To be frank, if the world was going to end and I had to die in order for that not to happen then I would most likely do it. But if I had to die so a small child wouldn't get killed by someone, then most likely not.
(There is a movie about this called, 'Circle')
His decision to buy the land went against his own belief to strictly follow the words of the Constitution.
<span>The Constitution gave no guidance about acquiring lands from other countries. Jefferson was going out on a limb with the Louisiana Purchase.</span>
<span>When
it was over, the Viet Cong basically ceased to be an effective force
any longer. Their ranks were decimated. All of the territory lost during
the offensive was shortly won back. But the ability of the Communists
to launch such a widespread coordinated offensive convinced the American
media and ultimately the American public that the war was now a lost
cause and demanded a withdrawal. So, tactically, it was a military
success for the U.S. but it served as a public relations success for
North Vietnam.
I believe the answer may be </span>
<span>U.S. forces dealt the Vietcong a massive military loss and regained control of all areas that the Vietcong had attacked.</span>
