Probably not because that rebellious phenomenon of the 60's generation was unique of its kind.
Nowadays, the impact that bands like U2 have had in different generations can be a slim comparison because one way ot the other, Bono has transcended the music industry with his personal projects and ideas of human rights, all of them anchored id the popularity of the band.
<span>Henry Knox was Secretary of War under the Articles of Confederation and held the same position as the Secretary of War in Washington's first cabinet.</span>
Emigration i think.........
Answer:
I can answer your question for A.
Explanation:
South America and North America began to exchange goods and both of their economies prospered, and the Monroe doctrine dictated that European powers were forbidden from interfering or colonizing South America
Answer:
It is too far to read, please upload and I will answer :)
Explanation:
Aurangzeb did not respect his father and also throwed him to prison. Akbar was the third successor of the Bhabur the founder of the Mughal dynasty. Aurangzeb was the great grand son of Akbar and son of Shah jahan. Akabar did respected his parents and his Dynast and promoted the growth of his Dydnasty. He was one of the main reason why Mughal empire lost it’s power. Thus aurangzeb is totaly different from akbar. Mughal rulers', Akbar and Aurangzeb, policies were motivated by religious fluidity by Akbar who created a diverse, accepting, and highly successful empire while Aurangzeb's religious rigidity was the downfall of the Mughals. Akbar was very against having one religion in charge, eliminated the Jizya, made Persian the official language, established the Ibadat Khana and the Divine Faith in Fatehpur, combined religions. Aurangzeb returned to religious orthodoxy and reestablished the Jizya, resulted in revolts of sikhs and hindus and ultimately led to the downfall of the empire.
