Answer:
popular sovereignty
Explanation:
popular sovereignty is the only one that isn't correct
Answer:
In this example Hector is the appellant
Explanation:
An appellant is a person who is not happy or satisfied with the decision of a lower court and hence he/she appeals to the higher court for looking into the decision taken by the lower court with an expectation of reversing the decision of the lower court.
Since, Hector is also appealing to the higher court with an expectation of reversing the decision of the lower court, he will be known as an appellant
I thank it may be <span>characterized by multiparty harmony hope this helped
</span>
Uhm what is this... chile-
Answer:
Since the end of the nineteenth century, it had been clear that the resource-rich and rapidly industrializing United States was the world's rising superpower, but the US was reluctant to adopt this mantle. This was rooted in history: the country took to heart George Washington's advice in his Farewell Address that it steer clear of involvement in European politics and conflicts.
The US did enter belatedly into World War I, but after that war, it retreated back into isolationism, stunningly refusing to enter the League of Nations, despite this organization being close to the heart of President Woodrow Wilson. The US was equally reluctant to join in World War II (though FDR knew this was inevitable) until the country was directly attacked at Pearl Harbor.
After the War ended in 1945, however, the US finally fully accepted its role as a world leader. This was an enormous change in its orientation to international politics. The US was at the forefront in establishing the UN, headquartering...
Hope this is Correct.
