Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
-3,-1,0,2,4 (hope this helps)
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there were no options attached, we can say the following.
This is an example of cultural appropriation.
What this businessman is doing is stereotyping Hispanic people that indeed they were like that, but 100 years ago. But bot today. Not even close.
It would be the exact same case if, in some South American country, a businessman would try to sell United States products, hiring a US citizen and making his wear clothes to look like Uncle Sam, and talking like Uncle Sam or wearing Quakers clothes and behave as colonists did during colonial America.
Here are some the following Characteristics of Gymnosperms:-
1. They do not produce flowers.
2. Seeds are not formed inside a fruit.
3. They are found in colder regions where snowfall occurs.
4. They develop needle-like leaves.
5. They are perennial or woody, forming trees or bushes.
6. They are not differentiated into ovary, style and stigma.
7. It’s a Xylem which means it does not have vessels and the phloem has no companion cells and sieve tubes.
Hope this helped and have a nice day : )
Answer:
1. 481 ft
2. north, south, east, and west
3. The pyramids were built as burial places and monuments to the Pharaohs.
4. This was the journey Egyptians believed all people took after death, and they filled their tombs with objects and paintings to help them get there.
5. pharaohs were god- on earth
Explanation:
number 10 is The first of Snefru’s two later pyramids at Dahshūr, called the Blunted (or Bent) Pyramid, was the first ever to be designed as a true pyramid. Although it was begun with steep sides, engineers were forced to reduce the angle of the sides when structural faults appeared midway through construction, producing the bent appearance of the structure
