We can actually see that the first step in comparing opposing arguments is: Identifying the claims made in both arguments.
<h3>What is argument?</h3>
Argument is known to be a statement that is made in order to convince an audience or someone that what you are referring to is accurate and valid. To validate an argument, evidence is necessary.
Thus, we can see that the first step in comparing opposing arguments is by "identifying the claims made in both arguments".
Well to be honest, of the Military forces attacking Isis is dangerous and so is not doing it. I would say attacking Isis is 95% better than not because what if people ended up getting injured again.
