Question

On what grounds does Hamilton argue that the judicial department of government is the least powerful branch of government? 2. Why do you suppose that Hamilton was so careful to point out the relative impotence of the judiciary? 3. What was Hamilton’s position regarding the power of the judiciary to declare void any legislative acts that were contrary to the Constitution? 4. Why does Hamilton consider the independence of the judiciary to be a vital component of constitutional government? 5. What arguments does Hamilton use to support life tenure for judges?

Answer 1

Answer and Explanation:

1. Hamilton says that it has for all intents and purposes no capacity to force on the Constitution. The legal branch has neither power nor will, along these lines it can just exercise judgment.  

2. To pick up the individuals' trust by bringing up that the administration would not be utilized to preclude the rights from claiming the individuals.  

3. The courts are made to check intensity of previous choices between the lawmaking body and the individuals. For instance, if a law clashes with the Constitution, the latest wins since it speaks to the individuals' needs.  

4. Since the courts are the foundation of the Constitution, they shield from enfringement on the individuals' privileges. Without autonomy, judges would not have the option to check for enfringements.  

5. In the first place, Hamilton says that life residencies liberates decided from political weight that originate from the governing body or official. This permits judges to prepare for unlawful laws. At that point, he says that judges have loads of requests, which shows that solitary scarcely any men can become judges as a result of their moral characteristics.