<span>The federal organization charged with monitoring illegal workplace discrimination is called the equal employment opportunity commission (EEOC).
When you are applying for a job or working for a company it is illegal for them to not pick you of something based on what you look like or your gender, nationality and the characteristics that make you, you. Each person regardless of what they look like have to be treated the same and given equal employment opportunity. If there is known discrimination in the workplace, there is a hotline that employees can call to report their workplace to the EEOC.
</span>
Answer:
$10.80
Explanation:
Given that:
A first-period efficient allocation cost = $10
The constant marginal extraction cost MEC for both periods = $2
The social discount rate (r) = 10%
∴
The efficient undiscounted market price for the 2nd period can be determined by using the formula:
Answer:
price variance 12,000 U
quantity variance 4,500 U
Explanation:
std cost $9.00
actual cost $9.20
quantity 60,000
These are givens so no calculation needed.
difference $(0.20)
price variance $(12,000.00)
The difference is negative, we purchase at a higher price, so the variance is unfavorable
std quantity 59500.00 (7 lbs per unit x 8,500 untis manufactured)
actual quantity 60000.00
std cost $9.00
difference -500.00
efficiency variance $(4,500.00)
The difference betwene standard lbs and the actual lbs used into production is negative, we use more lbs than standard. This variance is also unfavorable.
Answer:
Option "C" is the correct answer to the following question.
Explanation:
Dead-weight loss : A dead-weight loss seems to be a burden or tax or pay to society generated by the ineffectiveness of the economy, which arises when market forces are out of control. Dead-weight loss may be attributed to any deficit caused by an inadequate redistribution of capital primarily used of economy.
Answer: Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue.
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Sarah who is the controller of a large beverage supplier, supervises two employees and that her boss, Vladimir, told her to increase the company's inventory balance for an amount that is material to the financial statements by crediting several small "miscellaneous" expense accounts.
We are further told that Sarah does not know the reason behind this but told one of her staff to make them because she has been instructed to do so.
We can see that Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue. She didn't evaluate the effect of what she is doing. In this case, what her boss told her to do could be a case of fraud and she just obliged without asking questions which will put her conscience at ease in case anything happens but the fact that she just did it without asking questions or thinking if what she has done is morally right or wrong, it shows that Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue.
