Answer:
Product market expansion grid
Explanation:
Product market expansion grid -
It is used to plan for the company , when the company is indeed of expanding , is referred to as Product market expansion grid .
The strategy or information required for the company to increase sale of the goods and services or introducing a new product in the upcoming market , uses this plan.
Hence , from the given information of the question,
The correct term is Product market expansion grid .
Answer:
$5,000
Explanation:
Calculation to determine what amount should Martin report as investment income from its ownership of Foster's shares
Using this formula
Amount to be reported as investment income=Net income*Percentage of outstanding shares purchased
Let plug in the formula
Amount to be reported as investment income=$25,000 x 20%
Amount to be reported as investment income= $5,000
Therefore The amount that Martin should report as investment income from its ownership of Foster's shares is $5,000
Answer:
$15,750
Explanation:
The computation of the net income reported by two methods is shown below:
= Income from Corporal + Non-controlling interest income
= $12,600 + $3,150
= $15,750
Or we can one thing also
= Income from Corporal ÷ acquiring percentage
= $12,600 ÷ 80%
= $15,750
All other information that is mentioned in the question is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
Answer:
Cost savings in sourcing from Country A = $0.5 million ($57.5 - $57 million)
Explanation:
Sourcing from Country A:
Purchase price = $0.55 per unit
Shipping = $0.02
Total Cost = $0.57
Cost of 100 million units = $57 million
Sourcing from Country B:
Purchasing price = $0.44 ($0.55 x 80%)
Shipping = $0.06
CIF Tariff = 15% = $0.075 ($0.5 x 15%)
Total Cost = $0.575
Cost of 100 million units = $57.5 million
Sourcing from Country A is more beneficial than sourcing from Country B with reduced product cost, but increased shipping and additional tariff. Whereas Country A gives a total cost for 100 million units of $57 million, sourcing the same units from Country B gives a total cost of $57.5 million. The savings of $0.5 million is substantial that no company would like to lose unless the goods from Country B are of higher quality than those from Country A.
