Answer:
Yes. Article XXVIII of the Arizona constitution is a violation of Maria-Kelly's freedom of speech as enshrined in the first amendment to the US Constitution.
Explanation:
The first amendment to the constitution guarantees Maria-Kelly freedom of speech. Therefore, to force Maria-Kelly not to speak Spanish to some Spanish-speaking persons with whom she dealt in the course of her work is an abridgment of her right to self-expression. Conclusively, Article XXVIII clearly violated her constitutionally protected free speech rights.
Answer:
How did they look, try to remember what color skin what type of hair ?
Answer and Explanation:
1. In order to test these hypotheses, it would be necessary to gather a group of street women who undergo prostitution and leave them for a time living in shelters that offer the necessary resources for their survival and in environments with good order and physical harmony. These women would be subjected to this for a period of time and then it would be observed how many of them returned or were willing to return to prostitution. From then on, if the majority did not return or had the desire to return to prostitution, it would be because the chances are true.
2. If these hypotheses were really effective, I would establish a theory that could be applied to different neighborhoods not only in the country, but around the world. So I could help thousands of women to get out of this type of activity, have a better life and be able to contribute to society in a beneficial way.
Answer:
The date of the general election is set by federal law and has been fixed since 1845. It would take a change in federal law to move that date. That would mean legislation enacted by Congress, signed by the president and subject to challenge in the courts.
To call that unlikely would be an understatement.
And even if all of that happened, there would not be much flexibility in choosing an alternate election date: The Constitution mandates that the new Congress must be sworn in on Jan. 3, and that the new president’s term must begin on Jan. 20. Those dates cannot be changed just by the passage of normal legislation.
After Louisiana’s announcement on Friday, Marc Elias, the prominent Democratic election lawyer, knocked down what he described as a wave of queries about whether the November election could be similarly revised.
“I am getting a lot of questions about the November election,” Mr. Elias wrote on Twitter. “While states can set their own primary days, the federal general election is set by federal statute as the the [sic] Tuesday following the first Monday in November. This date cannot be changed by a state nor by the President.”
Two examples of real-life instances where a person might engage in an error in reasoning and, as a result, come to a faulty conclusion about something that they observed are:
1. Concluding that a person is harsh because his face is not cheerful.
2. Predicting that it will rain because the weather is gloomy.
<h3>What is a Faulty Conclusion?</h3>
A faulty conclusion is reached when the pattern of reasoning is faulty. Before a conclusion can be reached on a matter, it is vital to test the observations beyond all reasonable doubts.
If this is not done, the probability of reaching a faulty conclusion will be high.
Learn more about faulty conclusions here:
brainly.com/question/2141635