1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Thepotemich [5.8K]
2 years ago
6

Provide two examples of real-life instances where you engaged in an error in reasoning and, as a result, came to a faulty conclu

sion about something that you observed.
Law
1 answer:
Molodets [167]2 years ago
5 0

Two examples of real-life instances where a person might engage in an error in reasoning and, as a result, come to a faulty conclusion about something that they observed are:

1. Concluding that a person is harsh because his face is not cheerful.

2. Predicting that it will rain because the weather is gloomy.

<h3>What is a Faulty Conclusion?</h3>

A faulty conclusion is reached when the pattern of reasoning is faulty. Before a conclusion can be reached on a matter, it is vital to test the observations beyond all reasonable doubts.

If this is not done, the probability of reaching a faulty conclusion will be high.

Learn more about faulty conclusions here:

brainly.com/question/2141635

You might be interested in
What factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation?
devlian [24]

The factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that

  • The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
  • The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
  • The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
  • The actions of defendant’s  led to a breach of the contract
  • The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
  • The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed.

For better understanding let's explain what tort interference means

  • There are two types of tortious interference
  1. Tortious interference with contract
  2. Tortious interference with good economic advantage.
  • Tort interference is regarded as an issue where one party was involved in something or does a thing to intentionally disregard another party’s business transactions or project

From the above we can therefore say that the answer the factors should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that:

  • The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
  • The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
  • The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
  • The actions of defendant’s  led to a breach of the contract
  • The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
  • The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed is correct

Learn more Tort interference from:

brainly.com/question/15058912

8 0
2 years ago
The parole officer has more contact and responsibility to the judge than the probation officer does.
amm1812
I’d say it would be FALSE
3 0
3 years ago
Laws created by Texas legislature are applied by police officers and courts. What is this called?
olasank [31]

Answer:

When a bill is passed in identical form by both the Senate and the House, it is sent to the president for his signature. If the president signs the bill, it becomes a law. Laws are also known as Acts of Congress. Statute is another word that is used interchangeably with law.

7 0
2 years ago
In a criminal court case, who recommends a sentence to the judge?
Lesechka [4]

Answer:

The people who most commonly speak at a sentencing hearing are the prosecutors, the defense attorney, the victims, and the defendant. Rule 32 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure grants both the defendant and defense counsel the right to speak to the court before a sentence is imposed. First, even before a defendant appears before a judge, prosecutors may agree, as part of a plea agreement, to recommend a lower sentence or to charge a less serious crime in exchange for the defendant's cooperation.

6 0
2 years ago
How do we know that the opinions of people who call in to radio talk shows are not typical of most Americans?
riadik2000 [5.3K]
The answer is the first one
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In your opinion do you think the two officers who fired their weapons was Taylor justified in using force to protect themselves?
    14·1 answer
  • Choose the answer that best describes when drivers must always yeild to emergency vehicles with lights and sirens on
    6·1 answer
  • Zimzalabim Zim-zimzalabim?​
    11·1 answer
  • The term "uppers" refers to .<br> A. depressants<br> B. stimulants.<br> C. sedatives.
    14·1 answer
  • What can robots do that humans cannot do?
    6·2 answers
  • The people living within a riding are called
    6·1 answer
  • Give your own example of the 5th Amendment.
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT considered a specialized court?
    10·2 answers
  • The policy framework and guidelines for community policing state that you should consider 13 interrelated elements to understand
    9·1 answer
  • How do it get through to customer service number
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!