Answer:
There are many answers so ima give one, We can listen and understand the candidates objective by looking at there past, Most would have done charity or giving to people in need. When they were younger they weren't as fortunate and lived like the majority before they became a candidate. This may show if they are trust worthy enough to represent the majority because they understand what its like for people in need.
Explanation:
Answer:
i would say opportunity cost
Explanation:
I DON'T KNOW ANYTHING REGARDING ECONOMICS SO DON'T TRUST ME 100% I WAS DRAWN BY TAE PFP
but it was an opportunity and value means cost??
<h2>
Answer:</h2>
<em><u>(16,800-$34,300 on average)-based on if its public or private.</u></em>
<em><u /></em>
<em><u>Thank you for asking this great question need any other help please let me know by commenting below I'd be glad to help.</u></em>
<em><u /></em>
<em><u> I'd also greatly appreciate you if you mark me as brainliest and click that thanks button.( optional )</u></em>
<em><u /></em>
<em><u>Your brainly friend ( lauralit1 )</u></em>
<em><u /></em>
It could help opening door I gues and could be helpful to the trunk opening if kidnapped or som
The SCOTUS did not rule that T.L.O’s 4th amendment (searches and seizures) rights had been violated. They ruled that the school administrations search of the bag was reasonable under the circumstances (i.e T.L.O. Being a minor and on school property, meaning that while at school, administration is responsible for the well-being and safety of all students, thus allowing them to search T.L.O’s bag for marijuana). A good way to think of it is that while you’re at school, the administration acts as your parents. Your parents don’t need a warrant to search through your room and neither does the administration if you are on school property. The 4th amendment applies to this case because it protects against unlawful searches and seizures (i.e. searches and seizures that are without a warrant). The constitutional question was whether or not T.L.O. Could be charged with a crime/punished or not because the school administration did not have a warrant. However, because the school administration was acting as a loco parentis (latin term for “in place of the parent”) they did not need a warrant to search her bag. Hope this helped!
