Governments typically had been either unitary or confederated. Or another way to say that is that they either focused on centralized power (in someone like a king) or particularized power -- the power in the parts of a kingdom rather than at the center.
So, for instance, in France (prior to its Revolution), all the power in the kingdom centered in the hands of the king. For 175 years, they didn't even have a meeting of the Estates General which was their version of a representative body. And the power of nobles on their lands was reduced while the king's power grew.
Meanwhile, in the German territories, there was a loose confederation called the Holy Roman Empire. One of the kings or princes held the title of "emperor," but he really had no imperial power. The confederated German states retained control over their own kingdoms or territories.
The American experiment mixed something of the best of both approaches. There would be strong central power in the federal government, but putting checks and balances on that power by retaining certain aspects of control in the hands of the states within the union.
I think it’s B I hope this helps
Answer:
it's c you are right I trust
Answer:
The Correct Answer is D
Explanation:
Facts of the Southern colonies population by 1750 are such as:
- Due to the shortage of labor in the South, they started the use of Slaves from Africa by 1750 there were some couple of million slaves.
- Slavery was legal in the Southern colonies
- The children born in a slave family became slaves themselves.
- In Southern colonies sometimes families were broken apart and sold them to other plantation owners.
- In Southern colonies, people who are enslaved are often beaten and abused.
