Sherif's work on the autokinetic effect primarily demonstrates the power of <u>social roles</u>, and Asch's studies on line judgments demonstrate the power of <u>normative influence</u>.
Sherif's experiment showed group norms are set up through interaction of people and the leveling-off of excessive opinions. The end result is a consensus agreement that tends to be a compromise...even if it is wrong.
Muzafer Sherif performed a conventional look at on conformity in 1935. Sherif put subjects in a dark room and instructed them to look at a pinpoint of mild and say how a long way it moved. Psychologists had formerly discovered a small, unmoving light in a darkish room might appear to be transferring. This changed into categorized the autokinetic effect.
Sherif's work counseled that our information of the arena was encouraged by means of others within the absence of goal cues. Asch suggested that even with the physical cues, our perception of the arena is colored with the aid of others (or as a minimum our verbal behavior concerning the perception of the arena is colored by the group).
Learn more about Psychologists here: brainly.com/question/12011520
#SPJ4
I believe the answer is: <span>whose name you have heard most often.
We would automatically perceive the people which name we heard most often are the most popular people compared to other candidates.
A lot of us would automatically attribute those popularity with positive things and increase our likelihood to choose them.</span>
Found this on the internet
....
Terrorism constitutes a real threat to democracy, the rule of law and the enjoyment of human rights. As such it must be countered through prevention and suppression by the member States of the Council of Europe. However, poorly implemented or overly Draconian counter-terrorism measures can be counterproductive. While law enforcement operations aimed at terrorists are necessary and justified, counter-terrorism measures should not go beyond what is necessary to maintain peace and security, nor should they subvert the rule of law and democracy in the cause of trying to save it.
Answer:
1.It Doesn’t Account for Discouraged Workers
2. It Ignores Other Marginally Attached Workers
3. It Doesn’t Separate Part-Time and Full-Time Workers
4. It Doesn’t Consider Whether People Have Low-Paying Jobs
5. It Doesn’t Capture the Long-Term Unemployment Rate
Explanation:
Answer:
Llama because of merchants and traders i think maybe horse
Explanation:
