A reasonable view of the choice of using your friend as expert testimony is <u>D. The friend’s </u><u>insights</u> are valuable as peer testimony.
<h3>What is peer testimony?</h3>
Peer testimony is a testimony given by a person without the required specialist expertise in a particular matter.
Peer testimony serves as an assertion made by someone who has experience or knowledge of a particular matter. For example, your friend who has a brother with childhood Type I diabetes.
Thus, a reasonable view of the choice of using your friend as expert testimony is <u>Option D</u>.
Learn more about peer testimony at brainly.com/question/4214423
That statement is False.
If the researcher is using random sampling, All subjects that chosen for the study had equal responsibility of being chosen
When the researcher determines that the amount of female and male subjects, must be the same, the research no longer has the equal opportunity for all the test subjects to be chosen.
I was gonna say Court Appointment is the answer, but it could also be election procees.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "Commitment".
Explanation:
- An authorization from a court justice establishing the child in the care of a public juvenile prison agency or certain individual juvenile prison institution is considered an undertaking. Within detention settings, most offenders are pending trial and haven't been litigated as guilty.
- If a magistrate wants to move a lawsuit from such a court towards federal custody, a juvenile waiver happens. The offender shall be prosecuted as something of an individual and any rights that can occur in criminal cases shall be refused.
Therefore, it's the right answer.
