He first Crusade was in the period (1096-1099) and the Fourth Crusade
was in the period (1202-1204)
<span>(1202-1099)----------103 years <span>separated the First and the Fourth Crusades
</span></span>The crusades were a military campaigns with the specific objective of restoring christian control of the Holy Land<span> , were fought
over a period of almost 200 years.</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable?
No, really not.
The reason why because his account had created many controversies.
Eusebius has been known as the official historian of the church. He participated in the Council of Nice in 314, organized by Roman Emperor Constantine to revise the religious or historic documents that would end up being in the Bible.
So Eusebius based most of his comments on personal opinions and other historic document's interpretations. It is difficult to say that he did the proper research and had reliable sources. During the Nicea Council, a group of Bishops decided what documents had to be part of the Bible and which not, based on their own criteria. That is not a good indicator of the validity of the documents included, even less we can consider those as sacred.
It helps to protect the rights of the accused
The first time Burr made Hamilton angry, according to americanhistory.com, was:
"The rivalry between Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr had its roots in a 1791 Senate race. Aaron Burr defeated Philip Schuyler who was Hamilton's father-in-law. Schuyler as a Federalist would have supported George Washington's<span>and Hamilton's policies while Burr as a Democratic-Republican opposed those policies."
I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
</span>
Answer:
D. (Both trails were created after railroads spread West.)
Hope this helps :)
Mark me BRAINLEST please.... :3
