The following statements describe accurately the terms of this mortgage:
-"The monthly interest rate is 4 percent". This means that each month, the owner will have to pay the normal fee plus 4% of it.
-"Monthly payments must be for 30 years". This means that the owner will have to make a payment every month for 30 years in order to pay their debt.
-"The homeowner is borrowing $200.000". This is the amount of money the homeowner is borrowing from the bank or company, which they will pay by making monthly payments for 30 years.
The other three statements do not describe the terms of the mortgage as they misunderstand the details.
-Payments must be made for 30 years, with 12 months each year, it makes it 360 payments in total. Not monthly payments for 360 years and the homeowner is not borrowing $360.000 either.
-The annual interest rate is not 4.8% . The correct way to find this value is by taking into account days and months, which would make it be around 60%.
Constitution provides rights to the citizen. "People have a constitutional right to voice their opinion freely and without fear would be possible in a <u>democracy</u>." Thus, option E is correct.
<h3>What is democracy?</h3>
Democracy has been the governmental form that allows the citizens to choose the authority or the government by the method of voting. It has elected representatives to support the people.
It allows freedom and provides rights to the citizens as it is derived from the power of people and their will. It involves the power and benefits of the people directly or indirectly.
Therefore, option E. <u>democracy</u> allows the citizens to voice their opinions freely.
Learn more about democracy, here:
brainly.com/question/17627950
#SPJ1
Your question is incomplete, but most probably your full question was, People have a constitutional right to voice opinion freely and without fear would be possible in (a) ________.
A. totalitarianism
B. socialism
C. communism
D. secular totalitarianism
E. democracy
What error in judgement did the Portuguese make?
Answer: The error in judgement that the Portuguese had made was to accept a to meet the king amicably and offer him some gifts brought to the king. But it turns out that not only did the king already saw the portuguese as thieves and saw their gift as nothing special.
I hope it helps, Regards.
Sometime in the mid-1970s the term peace process became widely used to describe the American-led efforts to bring about a negotiated peace between Israel and its neighbors. The phrase stuck, and ever since it has been synonymous with the gradual, step-by-step approach to resolving one of the world's most difficult conflicts. In the years since 1967<span> the emphasis in Washington has shifted from the spelling out of the ingredients of "peace" to the "process" of getting there. … Much of US constitutional theory focuses on how issues should be resolved – the process – rather than on substance – what should be done. … The United States has provided both a sense of direction and a mechanism. That, at its best, is what the peace process has been about. At worst, it has been little more than a slogan used to mask the marking of time.</span><span>[2]</span>
Answer:
Freud's Drive Theory
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the statement is describing Sigmund Freud's Drive Theory. This theory states that behaviors, thoughts and emotions are all motivated by two basic drives, which would be sex and aggression. Stating that it until these drives are taken care of it creates psychological anxiety that motivates for these actions to occur.
