Well, everybody has their own reasons for literally everything. It all depends on what's happened in the person's life. If someone loses someone, or get's hurt, or something they take out their pain on other people, leading them to kill people.
All of this goes under sociology, behavioral science, criminology, victimology, and psychology.
As for hatred, I don't know that people "love" it. People just have a need to be defiant and rebellious.
As for power, people are sometimes control freaks. They need to be in control of all situations. This has to do with how they were treated as a child. If they were beaten, or bullied, they'd like to rise up and become the beater or the bully.
Hope that helps!
I would say A and B are correct.
Answer:
Explanation:In historiography, the term historical revisionism identifies the re-interpretation of an historical account.[1] It usually involves challenging the orthodox (established, accepted or traditional) views held by professional scholars about a historical event or time-span or phenomenon, introducing contrary evidence, or reinterpreting the motivations and decisions of the people involved. The revision of the historical record can reflect new discoveries of fact, evidence, and interpretation, which then results in revised history. In dramatic cases, revisionism involves a reversal of older moral judgments.
At a basic level, legitimate historical revisionism is a common and not especially controversial process of developing and refining the writing of histories. Much more controversial is the reversal of moral findings, whereby what mainstream historians had considered (for example) positive forces are depicted as negative. Such revisionism, if challenged (especially in heated terms) by the supporters of the previous view, can become an illegitimate form of historical revisionism known as historical negationism if it involves inappropriate methods such as:
the use of forged documents or implausible distrust of genuine documents
attributing false conclusions to books and sources
manipulating statistical data
deliberately mis-translating texts
This type of historical revisionism can present a re-interpretation of the moral meaning of the historical record.[2] Negationists use the term "revisionism" to portray their efforts as legitimate historical revisionism. This is especially the case when "revisionism" relates to Holocaust denial.
ba saang ramayana goleh goleh
Marginal benefit is more than marginal cost that is why some people more than others enjoy buying a lot of shoes.
Explanation:
When marginal benefit is more than marginal cost the resources were used more efficiently, when there is increase in the quantity. Marginal cost is the cost incurred by producing one extra unit of the commodity. Marginal benefit is referred to as the extra benefit received by consuming one extra unit of the benefit.
in case of shoes the consumer will buy more shoes because he or she is getting extra benefit by consuming one extra unit but when the marginal cost becomes more than the marginal benefit he or she will not like the benefit because the consumer has to pay more for using the benefit.
