Justin's point of view shows that he was attacked by Max, which caused him to fight back with violence. He has no bias, as it shows that he just defended himself.
In this case, we have evidence that Justin was attacked because he shows that Max and his friends had already teased him before this fight in the cafeteria.
Following this example and the information in the table below, we can answer the other tables as follows:
- Max and Erick has the point of view that Max was attacked by Justin. Both claim they were just talking, joking, and laughing with each other when Justin attacked Max. They are not biased as they just tell how things happened in their point of view. Their account shows evidence that Max was attacked.
- Antony presents a neutral point and view, as he didn't see how the fight started, he only saw how it ended. He has no bias but shows evidence that Max started the fight, as he saw him playing and having fun with friends around Justin.
- Megan presents the point of view that maybe Max started the fight. She wasn't present at the moment, but she hints at the bias that Max has been acting weird, different, so he might have started a fight for no reason.
- The cafeteria worker presents the view that there has been a misunderstanding between the boys. It shows evidence that Justin started the fight because Max was playing with his friends when he bumped into Justin, who without caring about the situation attacked Max. He does not show bias.
It is important to point out that bias is the tendency to believe in one side, through a single thought, without analyzing evidence and evidence.
More information:
brainly.com/question/973320?referrer=searchResults
