True maybe hope this helps
have a nice day
If the statement above asks whether it is true or false. The answer would be true. It is because when you have common knowledge, it is not needed for it to be quoted for it is already common among people and it is already a knowledge of which people knows about without searching or asking about it. Quotation marks are only used when you try to quote or say things that are from the original author, information or who or where it came from and it's not yours. With common knowledge, there is no need to use them for it is already known by a lot of people and are too obvious for it to be asked of.
In the context of the different techniques used by an inference engine to manipulate a series of rules, <u>forward chaining</u> refers to a series of "if-then-else" condition pairs.
<h3>What is an inference engine? </h3>
An inference engine is a part of the system that applies logical rules to the knowledge base to deduce new information. The first inference engines were components of expert systems.
Therefore, the correct answer is forward chaining.
learn more about forward chaining: brainly.com/question/15303791
#SPJ12
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
A responsability chart is useful for describing the participation of persons completing labors and deliverables for a project or a business process. Some of the information considered in this type of chart is:
- Labor or procedure.
- Responsible.
- Supervisor.
- delivery date.
Answer:
Forgery refers to the crime pertaining to, alternation of legal obligation or rights in writing of another person. It is the production of the spurious work which is being considered to be genuine such as a painting, and coin. It is the action underlying imitation or forging a copy of the document, banknote, work of art and signature.
In the case, Debbie Brooks is solely responsible for the loss caused to her by the forged transaction. The fraud took place due to the recklessness of Debbie Brooks as she allowed Martha Tingstrom to handle her financial resources and accounts which in itself is a mistake. She failed to notice the transaction details promptly issued to her periodically by her bank and provided the details of such transaction to the bank within a period of 30 days. The bank is not liable as it has perform its obligation to the fullest. Therefore, it is ascertained that Debbie Brooks is solely responsible for the loss caused to her by the forged transaction made by Martha Tingstrom.
Explanation:
