Answer:
a. Relevant
Explanation:
The documentary on prime time television that brought awareness to Cook Inc... being defendant in several lawsuits relating to it's defective tyres that has caused vehicles to overturn is a financial information that is relevant.
As a financial analyst, being presented with such information is very relevant and it makes me to consider it as a factor before issuing loan to the organization and also help to garner what the public'e perception of the company stock will be. In addition, the information will help to make predictions about future directions of the company's stock price and, evaluate the company's financial health and earnings potential to be able to pay back the loan if given the loan.
Answer:
B. Flattened management hierarchies.
Explanation:
In this scenario, the line workers at a Virginia steel mill developed a new process that made the line safer. The process went through only one level of management before it was approved by the vice president of operations. Hence, this is an example of a flattened management hierarchies.
A flattened management hierarchy can be defined as an organizational structure which eliminates a middle manager and allows the employees to be involved directly with the decision-making process.
Hence, by the removal of the middle management in an organization, the flattened management hierarchy creates a direct relationship between employees and the top executives of the company; thus, giving room for innovation and actions by employees in the decision-making process.
Answer:
The unemployment rate is 12.5%
Explanation:
The formular for solving unemployment rate is:
Number of unemployed persons/ Total number of civilian force × 100
The number of unemployed persons is 6 million
The total number of civilian force is 6milllion + 42 million = 48 million
Therefore unemployment rate is
6/48 ×100 = 12.5%
Thus, the unemployment rate is 12.5%
Answer:
The correct answer is False.
Explanation:
This statement is false, since the residual theory of dividends argues that these are irrelevant, that is, that the value of the company is not affected by its dividend policy. The main drivers of this theory are Modigliani and Miller. Both authors affirm that the value of the company is determined solely by the profitability and the degree of risk of its assets (investments), and that the way in which the organization divides its income between dividends and reinvestment does not have a direct effect on its value .
However, some studies show that significant changes in dividends affect the price of shares in the same direction, that is, increases in dividends translate into increases in stock prices, and vice versa. In response, M and M propose that the positive effects of dividend increases be attributed, not to the dividend itself, but to the informational content of dividends with respect to future income. Thus, any increase in dividends would cause investors to raise the price of the shares, while a decrease would cause a corresponding decrease in the price of the shares.
