Answer: $8600
Explanation:
Joint cost allocation:
Product :
Loin chops
Pounds - 3000
Price per pound - $5
ground
Pounds - 10,000
Price per pound - 2.00
ribs
Pounds - 4,000
Price per pound - 4.75
bacon
Pounds - 6,000
Price per pound - 3.50
total joint cost - $43000
Sales cost per product :
Loin chops - 3000 × 5 = $15,000
Ground = 10000 × $2 = $20,000
Ribs - 4000 × $4.75 = $19,000
Bacon - 6000 × $3.50 = $21,000
Loin cost allocation is given by :
Total joint cost × (sales value of Loin chops ÷ Total sales value of all products)
$43,000 × ($15,000 ÷ $(15,000 + 20,000 + 19,000 + 21,000))
$43,000 × ( $15000 ÷ $75000)
$43,000 × 0.2 = $8600
Answer:
C. $20,000
Explanation:
Given the data below,
Property transfered = $200,000
Basis = $60,000
Return = 82℅
Fair market value = $180,000
Long term fair market value = $20,000
In the above scenario, we can safely say that Eileen realized gain of $140,000 on the transfer of property, which is due to;
Property worth $200,000 - basis $60,000 = $140,000.
However, because recognized gain cannot exceed the lesser of realized gain ($140,000) or the boot received ($20,000), the recognized gain is therefore $20,000
Answer:
a. Ending merchandise inventory is overstated by $4,000.
net sales revenue of $59,000
cost of goods sold of $17,000 + $4,000 = $21,000
gross profit = $38,000
Since ending inventory was overstated, it means that COGS were understated.
b. Ending merchandise inventory is understated by $4,000.
net sales revenue of $59,000
cost of goods sold of $17,000 - $4,000 = $13,000
gross profit = $46,000
Since ending inventory was understated, it means that COGS were overstated.
<u>Answer:</u>
less
<u>Explanation:</u>
The law of diminishing marginal utility states that, as consumption of a good or service increases, its marginal utility decreases.
