Basically, it states that we should always act in ways that are beneficial for society as a whole. A utilitarian's view on global poverty is as follows. Peter Singer, a utilitarian, believes that every person should be taking one percent of their income and donating it to eradicating poverty and helping those in need
It keeps deleting my answer so I'll post it again here
Explanation:
Utilitarianism is a theory of ethics wherein the proper course of action is the one that maximizes its utility. The utilitarian view of the issue of world poverty is one that intends to maximize the benefit in a way that reduces possible suffering. This perspective is intended to push society, or the world, into becoming a better place overall. To achieve the greatest good for all of those suffering from world poverty, a utilitarian view would consist of a process that outlines the best way to do such. It would explore possible solutions/courses of action, and support the most effective and "morally good" option. A utilitarian view could involve redistributing wealth from the rich to the poor because it would increase the society's utility. The decision of where to lend the wealth would also be a decision based upon its utility made after gathering all possible information. The donations from everyone is an act of charity that will help those in need (the poor, less fortunate) and base one's life (especially the lives of those more fortunate and wealthy) around helping others to create a better society and do the most good possible on an individual level.
