Martin Luther King participated in the boycott. it was a campaign of social protest and it was a very important event in the civil rights movement.
I think its c. this contract must be in writing based on the collateeal contract at stake. i hope its right
Explanation:
Its the fundamental tenet of Muslims that all those who do not believe in Allah, are infidels and do not deserve to live. Same was the case when the Muslims came invading India, they gave two options: to convert or die! Later on the Muslims diluted their “killing" options to “extra tax" or “protection money". The long Muslim rule over a large part of India with such inhuman rules have caused deep resentment among the Hindus who survive today.
Although, the Muslims got their own nation based on religion, a large number of Muslims consider themselves as Indians and live in harmony with the Hindus.
Presently, rarely any case of forcible conversion from Hindu to Islam come to notice, but the long-ingrained mutual hatred and distrust still exists. Hindus cannot forget the tragedies faced by their ancestors while some Muslim still harbour their dislike towards non-Muslims
It is important to understand that the construction of identities, when analyzed in contemporary times, must be viewed from two dimensions: “Conflicting diversity within the nation-state (regions, ethnic issues, etc.) and the emergence of transnational identity references. For example, the world of consumption. Different social groups can thus appropriate globalized symbolic references (from Madonna to hip-hop) to construct their own image, their “identity”. There is, therefore, a situation within which different "identities" complement or enter into dispute. The monopoly that the state had (or thought it had) collapsed. The construction of national identity must now be done in a context of diversification that previously did not exist, technological transformations are obviously important, but one should not fall into a reductionist temptation that gives technologies a transformative capacity that they do not possess. The world will no longer be democratic because the technologies we have are more sophisticated. Today there is a certain technological panacea that often deludes us. Social problems will not be solved with 'more technology' or 'less'.
