The <em>place </em>where water comes from <em>when it rains</em> is:
- <u>A. Water comes from the condensation of water vapor in the clouds when it rains.</u>
<u />
According to the given question, we are asked to state the <em>place </em>where water comes from <em>when it rains</em> and how it affects the distribution of rain around the area and surrounding places.
As a result of this, we can see that condensation occurs when there is an accumulation of water vapor in the clouds and then the water vapor would be converted to rain and when the<em> clouds get heavy</em>, they pour down as rain.
Therefore, the correct answer is option A
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/964555
Answer:
The correct answer is A. The argument presupposes the conclusion for which it purports to provide evidence.
Explanation:
The idea in this question is to identify the most vulnerable argument, for which it is possible to conclude that The first argument is only base in the opinion of the theorists and critics and there is no clear evidence or facts to prove the statement. It only states because of someone's opinion “no aesthetic evaluation of a work of art is sound if it is based even in part on data about the cultural background of the artist” simply the argument is false. This results as a fallacy since it is an argument without evidence to show that it is valid.
1
3 4
I think that’s the answers I’m not so sure
Option C
The peer review process, in which scientists submit write-ups of their ideas and experiments to a set of colleagues who judge how good the ideas are before the ideas can be published, is: A useful and important, even if imperfect, mechanism of quality-control for the scientific literature
<u>Explanation:</u>
The peer-review practice endures to approve scholarly work, accommodates to enhance the worth of proclaimed research, and builds networking circumstances in research areas. Notwithstanding critiques, peer review is yet the unique internationally affirmed system for research validation.
Peer review guarantees that documents undergo a fair evaluation and skillful opinion, enabling scholars to develop their script and therefore high-quality experimental interpretation and articles to be proclaimed. It also encourages the browsers to believe the scientific uprightness of the report and to present notified declarations where peer reviewer comments are ready.
