Answer:
Group of concrete nouns is
Library, books, America
Explanation:
Concrete Noun:
Nouns which can be perceived by any one or more of five senses (i.e touch, sight, hearing, taste, smell) are called concrete nouns. In other words things which have a physical existence are called concrete nouns Physical existence does not imply weight and matter only - it can also be light, noise, rainbow etc.
Some obvious examples of concrete nouns are table, room, glass, computer etc.
Opposite to concrete nouns are
Abstract Nouns: These nouns can not be perceived by five senses. They exist only as an idea. e.g wisdom, laziness, beauty etc.
Name of real countries, places, cities are considered concrete nouns. Country/city/town are also concrete nouns so are river, school, college.
Whereas paradise, colleague, angels, life, values, freedom are all abstract nouns.
Answer: The author's method of organizing a text. Causes stem from actions and events, and effects are what happen as a result of the action or event (Cause/Effect). Placing together characters, situations, or ideas to show common or differing features in literary selections(Compare/Contrast).
Explanation:
Answer:
D. Endorsed
Explanation:
the suffix ed is a past participle
Personally, I would choose this topic:Speech related to violence: You might want to write about limitations on freedom of speech related to violence. Speech that incites violence is not covered by the First Amendment and can result in prosecution in the United States. However, speech that merely supports violence as a political option is not considered a crime.
Part A: As this topic is something that is more of a national issue than one within one single school, I would address the letter to a member of congress. Addressing it to anyone else would do little to actually address the issue.
Part B:
Stance: While freedom of speech allows one to express their opinions publicly, those who engage in speech promoting violence, or hate speech, negatively impact society as a whole as well as on an individual level. As such, speech promoting violence should not be considered under the First Amendment, and those individuals who choose to engage in it should be persecuted.