A.
because as you're passing the page you are scanning it and looking for the answer
Answer:
Option d is the right one.
Explanation:
- Marginal research or analysis to optimize future gains as a decision-making method. In comparison to the expenses incurred by this same behavior, it calculates added benefits. The illustration described demonstrates that the marginal gain is smaller than that of the marginal cost.
- This involves purchasing goods until the marginal gain is equal to the marginal cost.
The other options aren't sufficient for the scenario provided. But that will be the best alternative for option d.
Answer:
19.07%
Explanation:
The computation of the total compound return over the 3 years is shown below:
= (1 + investment percentage earned in first year) × (1 + investment percentage earned in second year) × (1 + investment percentage loss in second year)
= (1 + 0.35) × (1 + 0.40) × (1 - 0.37)
= 1.35 × 1.40 × 0.63
= 1.1907
= 19.07%
Answer:
C) $ 80,000 $ 70,000
Explanation:
R = ($48,000/$120,000) x $200,000
=0.4×$200,000
= $80,000
S = $200,000-$50,000-$80,000
= $70,000
Therefore the sales value at split-off for products R is $80,000 and S $70,000
Answer:
Explanation:
St deviation of stock σ = √( β² x σ₁² + σ₂² )
σ₁ = standard deviation of market = .15 and σ₂ is standard deviation of firm
Putting the values given
.30 = √ ( β² x .15² + .10² )
.09 = β² x .0225 + .01
β² x .0225 = .08
β² = 3.5555
β = 1.88
