Thankyou magical genie that's out of the lamp !!!!!
Answer:
Can you include an image of the illustration?
Explanation:
The only way I can answer the question is if I know what the illustration is.
Answer:
Monopolistic competition
Explanation:
If Nori's company decisions need to be made taking the decisions of competing companies into account, it means that Nori's company operates in Monopolistic competition. This is because Monopolistic competition is an economic concept, which presents a situation where a company has several competitors. In this type of market, the decisions of a company in relation to production, distribution and price, interfere in the decisions of its competitors, who need to maintain competition and look for a way to obtain advantages.
Answer:
A) They both had the Free Exercise Clause, or the First Amendment.
B) Wisconsin v. Yoder was about kids not finishing school while Employment Division v. Smith was about doing illegal drugs in the workplace. That is why they had different holdings even though they were both for a religious purpose.
C) A member of the public that is upset about the holding in Employment Division v. Smith could have people sign petitions to pass a new law that would overturn the holding made by the Supreme Court.
Explanation: