I would say appeal based on logic. I'm not entirely sure, but that's what makes the most sense to me :)
Isn't it the Connecticut compromise? or Sherman's Compromise
Answer:
Gavrilo Princip was an angry citizen.
Explanation:
Gavrilo Princip was a Bosnian Serb conspirator who killed the heir to the Austro Hungarian Empire on 28 June 1914. He was linked to the Serbian secret organization Black Hand, which had previously become known for terrorist operations.
He was one of many conspirators who wanted as much independence as possible for their homeland, Bosnia, occupied by Austria-Hungary, hoping that this would be possible within the Kingdom of Serbia. The fact that it was Principle who killed Franz Ferdinand was largely coincidental, as several possible assassins involved in the conspiracy had been placed on the Archduke's cortege route in Sarajevo. Immediately after the assassination of the Archduke, Princip was arrested and sentenced to 20 years in prison.
Answer:
Knights
Explanation:
Knights were part of the medieval military and they served whoever employed them, which were mostly monarchs and nobles.
A second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal or conviction or multiple punishments for the same offense. The evil sought to be avoided by prohibiting double jeopardy<span> is </span>double<span> trial and </span>double conviction, not necessarily double<span> punishment.</span>
