Answer:
The correct answer for the exercise is:
Titles provide the identification of the topic. Pictures ilustrate the major ideas in the paper and graphs explain the data associated with every factor.
Explanation:
The correct answer to this answer is very extense so let's begin:
First of all, in the first paragraph, we can read that the creator of the paper "Marìa Echeverrìa" explains that Futbol is very popular among the general public, that it is so popular that it is not only played and watched in the television. But that is the main objective of bars, and restaurants. Then after the introduction, the general idea is supported by another second idea.
Also, the graph below the introductory paragraph describes the amount of Futbol championships won by Spanish talking countries. With this, graphs take another level of importance and we can understand a lot of data in a very interesting and catching form.
Then the following fraction of information describes that the public not only like Futbol but also baseball. Just to keep describing in which countries baseball is the second most popular sport and describe the countries in which the second sport is the other one. To finale with a graph that explains the popularity of each sport.
The correct answer is The lack of a seaport to trade goods might put the people at an economic disadvantage
Landlocked, inland or inland countries
Thus are known in the 'concert of nations' the 44 countries that have no outlet to the sea. In common, besides geography, poverty, the difficulty of doing trade, expanding its presence in the world, winning markets, etc. In Europe, only five of these countries have managed to get rid of poverty, but three of them have had to take serious risks in their banking systems so that, like the oceans, they attract wealth. We speak of Switzerland, Liechtenstein and Luxembourg. The other two European countries are Austria and San Marino. Africa contributes 16 more; Asia, ten; and South America, two more, Bolivia and Paraguay.
Answer:
Senate members represent state interests while House members represent district interests.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Answer:
<h2>the answer is in the pics .....</h2>
<h2>hope it helps..</h2>
