1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Digiron [165]
2 years ago
12

Develop an argument that evaluates the extent to which cultural, political, military, or economic changes resulting from the Col

d War affected ONE of the following regions between 1945 and 1991: Eastern Europe, East Asia and the Western Pacific, or Central America and the Caribbean.
History
1 answer:
Tpy6a [65]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

East Asia:

The end of World War 2 resulted in the utter collapse of the Axis powers, namely Germany, Italy, and Japan, and pulled the United States out of isolationism, which resulted in the emergence of two global superpowers: The United States and the Soviet Union. However, after the Yalta Conference, it quickly became clear that Stalin wished to dominate Eastern Europe and develop a buffer zone between the remnants of Germany and the USSR in order to 'protect against any possible future German aggression - at least officially. However, it was widely believed that Stalin wished to spread the revolution around the globe. This was despite promises of free elections in occupied territories.

The issue here is that Communism and Capitalism are drastically different and intensely clashing ideologies. One values freedom of market, while the other values state control of the markets. The emergence of nuclear weapons also made the Soviets come to a harsh realization - that the American arsenal was superior to theirs. As such, the Russians began developing nuclear weapons of their own, and they would soon see this success come to fruition. This created massive tensions between Russia and the United States, as the power of nuclear technology had already been displayed in full view on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Third, the American fear of communism and the sometimes excessive witch-hunting lead to extreme mistrust between the two powers. As such, they often supported opposing sides in proxy conflicts.

For this example, I will be using the outbreak of the Vietnam war. When the war began in 1955, America and Russia both began supplying their respective sides -  Russia, the Viet Minh and America the Republican government in Saigon. As the conflict escalated and it became increasingly spotlighted South Vietnam's inefficencies, lack of military competency, and underground pro-communist insurrections, America began deploying soldiers. This began slowly at first and escalated into over 543,000 active troops at its peak.

Despite such a large troop presence, the communist and their insurgent allies were continuing to gain victories. America became desperate to save face and secure some kind of victory, even if it was a strategic one. As such, they began napalming the Vietnamese jungles and bombing Hanoi and other major Northern cities in an attempt to weaken and possibly destroy the Soviet-backed government. As such, it is arguable that the American fervor for victory and triumph over the Communist cause was high enough that they were willing to attempt to destroy an entire nation. The damages done by the American military were massive, and the civilian casualties extreme. Because of this, we can say that this region of East Asia was riddled with conflict and devastation because of America and the Soviet Union's ideological rivalry.

You might be interested in
Which of the following countries did NOT sign a peace agreement with Napoleon?
max2010maxim [7]
I believe it’s C. Britain

brainliest will be much appreciated <3
4 0
3 years ago
Assessment ...again :c
777dan777 [17]
I pretty shure its vicksburg
5 0
3 years ago
Why did some Americans oppose the Louisiana purchase
Mrac [35]
Some Federalists were afraid the new comers were going to change the government.

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was a reason for southern secession? A. choosing Jefferson Davis as leader of the Confederate States B. f
I am Lyosha [343]

The correct answer is: C) familiarity with and disdain for the northern industrial workplace.

Secession and, therefore, Civil War were mainly about the right to own slaves. Slaves were, for the Southerns, the most important "material" in the workplace; their region relied on slave-owning in order to do agrarian work.

The Northerns, however, now were in their way to industrialization, where the work at factories was done by employed immigrants and, thus, they were all for abolishing slavery.

5 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HURRY!!!!!!
Klio2033 [76]
B hope this helps :)
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What economic activity was important to both the french and dutch settlements?
    14·1 answer
  • What are two affects of the Lewis and Clark Expedition
    13·1 answer
  • What would be a good picture for the daughter of liberty
    10·1 answer
  • When the Nazi death camps were liberated, people around the world were most shocked by the existence of the camps. the size and
    14·1 answer
  • The ruling in Roe v. Wade is an example of which of the following? A ) lobbying. B) affirmative action. C) a broad interpretati
    9·1 answer
  • Why does hamilton believe that a specific listing of rights "is far less applicable" to he federal constitution than to state co
    5·1 answer
  • What are some of the areas of our lives that ancient Greek culture still has infinence over today?
    8·1 answer
  • Describe three inventions from the late C19th.
    14·1 answer
  • In this excerpt from Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, Jacobs describes her owner, Mrs. Flint​
    5·1 answer
  • Explain why is it important that the federal government and the state governments have separate as well as shared powers.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!